Breast implants for thin skin and little soft tissue coverage can pose challenges since there is a perceived higher risk of implant palpability, rippling, and unnatural breast shape. Nonetheless, Beverly Hills plastic surgeon Dr. Tarick Smiley has recently demonstrated some surgical techniques and “core principles” that help him reduce such risks.
In Dr. Smiley’s recent Snapchat video post, he performed breast augmentation on a thin, small-breasted patient.
Dr. Smiley generally prefers the peri-areolar incision technique (i.e., a small scar blends into the dark-light skin junction); however, the patient has small areolas, which could make it difficult to conceal the scar, and thus he recommended the submammary fold instead in which the incision was concealed within the natural skin fold.
The celebrity plastic surgeon said the submammary fold incision measured only 3 cm thanks to the use of Keller Funnel technique; this involved a cone-shaped device that was lubricated profusely so the implant could be propelled inside the pocket in just one squeeze.
Because of the patient’s little soft tissue coverage, Dr. Smiley positioned the breast pocket beneath the chest muscle, which provided additional padding to reduce implant rippling and palpability.
Aside from implant placement (relative to the soft tissue layers), Dr. Smiley said natural results are further guaranteed when the implant’s size and dimension reflect the patient’s underlying anatomy, particularly relating to her chest and breast measurement.
Because the patient has a narrow chest wall, Dr. Smiley used high profile implants—i.e., they have narrower base but offer more vertical height—to ensure natural and proportionate results, which were the specific aesthetic goals of patients.
The high profile implants also suit the patient because she wanted additional projection. Furthermore, it complemented her thin frame.
Dr. Smiley warned that implants with lower profile (they have a wider base and project less) may not suit thin patients, particularly if these come with a base dimension that occupies too much space on the chest wall. Aside from higher risk of rippling along the edges of the breast, they could also result in excessive lateral bulge that looks anything but natural.
After ensuring that both breasts look symmetric, Dr. Smiley closed the incisions; the tissue beneath the skin was closed with absorbable sutures to ensure the best scar possible. The skin, meanwhile, was not picked up and instead “sealed” with a surgical tape to make certain that it would receive no or very little tension.