Upper pole fullness after breast augmentation can be achieved with precise physical examination of the breasts. The idea is to identify the “challenges” and anatomical variables that must be overcome to achieve the best shape and projection possible.
Of course, the patient must be able to describe in details her cosmetic goals and expectations. Hence, patient-doctor communication plays a crucial role in the satisfaction rate, as suggested by leading Beverly Hills plastic surgeon Dr. Tarick Smiley.
Dr. Smiley has recently posted a series of Snapchat videos showing one patient whose primary goal was to achieve increased upper pole fullness after breast augmentation.
While the patient’s pre-operative breasts had adequate soft tissue, they were remarkably pendulous that her areola sagged a few centimeters from its breast fold (or submammary crease). Further aggravating the sagging appearance was the deflated or “empty” upper breast pole.
Due to the extent of her breast sag, Dr. Smiley performed the standard breast lift technique in which an incision goes around the areola’s perimeter, down the midline, and then across the breast fold. The resulting scar from this method resembles an anchor, and so it is also aptly named as anchor lift.
before and after photos
Despite the growing popularity of modified breast lift techniques, the patient remained suited for the standard incision pattern because her areola required more than 5 cm of elevation, something that cannot be achieved with shorter incisions.
The anchor lift has allowed Dr. Smiley to remove some tissue and skin at the bottom of the breasts before lifting and reshaping the remaining tissue with the use of internal sutures. But as a stand-alone procedure, breast lift cannot give ample fullness on the upper poles of the breast—this is where implants become helpful.
Because the patient was more concerned about the final breast shape and fullness of the upper pole, a smaller or conservative-sized implant would suit her.
While showing the patient’s before and after photos, Dr. Smiley said “there is no significant change in her breast volume even with the use of implants, although the upper pole has received significant improvement in terms of looking full and youthful.”
The breast augmentation internal lift might be a good alternative to the standard breast lift technique in which the extent of scarring is often perceived as a major concern.
In standard breast lift (which is often combined with breast augmentation via implants), the scar goes around the areola’s border and within the submammary fold; hence it is well concealed. However, the main concern is the vertical scar that goes from the nipple down to the breast crease because it is placed in a more obvious location.
Leading Beverly Hills plastic surgeon Dr. Tarick Smiley has recently posted a Snapchat video to demonstrate how breast augmentation internal lift is accomplished.
The patient shown in the video had pseudo ptosis, which means that the breasts were sagging and the upper pole appeared deflated, but the nipple area had not drooped below the submammary fold.
Dr. Smiley created a U-shaped scar at the lower border of the areola to create an implant pocket. He also used internal sutures (they were vertically oriented) in the superficial fascia of the breast, particularly above the nipple area to elevate the tissue along with the areolar complex.
The vertical internal sutures that hold the nipple area and its surrounding tissue also give some fullness and tightness in the upper poles.
Precise pocket dissection is also a critical part of breast augmentation internal lift technique. Dr. Smiley says the goal is to prevent inadvertent implant displacement that may lead to sagging or bottomed-out appearance and excessive lateral bulge.
Despite the benefits of breast augmentation internal lift, Dr. Smiley says the technique is only suitable for patients with very minimal sag—i.e., their nipple does not require more than 3 cm elevation.
Meanwhile, patients with significant sagging—i.e., their nipple has drooped way below the submammary fold—will need the standard breast lift technique (with or without implants) to achieve the most desired results, says the celebrity plastic surgeon.
Regardless of the type of breast lift utilized at the same time as breast augmentation, Dr. Smiley highlights the importance of “respecting the skin to promote the best possible scar.”
While closing the U-shaped incision, Dr. Smiley is seen closing the wound in which the dermis beneath the skin was sutured while the actual skin edges were just allowed to kiss each other.
Cosmetic breast surgery that combines two or more procedures has become a common routine nowadays. In some situations, this is even a more preferable approach than having two separate surgeries in order to produce more natural results.
Today, the most common “combo” procedures are breast augmentation with lift, and breast reduction with lift, according to the California Surgical Institute website.
Breast augmentation with lift prevents a specific deformity called Snoopy due to its close resemblance to the profile of the classic cartoon dog.
When implants are used in sagging breasts without a simultaneous breast lift, their bottom edge might become visible beneath the lax skin, and thus there will be an appearance of two pairs of submammary fold.
But with a simultaneous breast lift, the implants will not “herniate” as the internal support and the actual breast tissues are reinforced with sutures. In addition, the south-pointing or low-lying nipple area is positioned higher to further achieve a proportionate result.
Breast lift is also commonly incorporated with breast reduction, a procedure that produces a smaller “cup size,” which in turn can provide instant relief from back pain, rounded shoulders, postural problems, and other ill effects of overlarge, heavy breasts.
Large breasts are susceptible to the effects of gravity (i.e., causing their skin to lose their elasticity), thus it always makes sense to incorporate some type of breast lift during the surgery.
Meanwhile, breast lift does not always entail a simultaneous breast reduction unless the patient specifically requests for a smaller cup size as well.
Cosmetic breast surgery involving combination procedures aim to produce a more natural-looking and youthful appearance—i.e., conical shaped, 45:55 breast ratio (i.e., most of the volume should be in the lower pole), proportionate nipple diameter relative to the breast size, and “ample” distance between the areola and the submammary fold.
A slight lateral bulge is also deemed ideal, although all efforts are made to prevent it from becoming excessive and thus giving an illusion that the breasts are too wide apart.
Also, it is ideal to produce a ski-slope appearance in the upper pole. In fact, one study has suggested that the ideal breast profile should have a 45:55 ratio, with the areolar complex serving as the delineating mark between the lower and upper breast poles.
Of course, good symmetry between the left and right breasts must be achieved during cosmetic breast surgery. For this reason, some patients may need different sized implants, or require more tissue removal or additional elevation on one side.
Mommy makeover revision surgery becomes necessary because of three basic reasons: inadvertent pregnancy, significant weight fluctuations, and botched results from the initial procedure.
A mommy makeover surgery is any combination of body contouring procedures that generally focus on improving the appearance of abdomen and breasts, areas that are highly susceptible to the effects of pregnancy.
Leading body contouring expert Dr. Tarick Smiley says all efforts are made to avoid the need for mommy makeover revision, adding that it always starts with proper patient selection—i.e., the patient must be near her ideal weight and is done having children.
Nevertheless, “inadvertent” pregnancy and drastic weight fluctuations do happen, which can change if not reverse the results of tummy tuck, breast augmentation, and breast lift, which are the three most common mommy makeover procedures performed by the celebrity plastic surgeon.
Oftentimes, mommy makeover revision is possible provided that the patient’s weight has been stable for at least six months and/or she has fully recovered from the “trauma” of childbirth (it takes about 6-12 months); however, a longer waiting period is deemed necessary if one chooses to breastfeed.
It is important to note that the hormones that trigger the body to produce milk have some effect on skin elasticity or shrinkage; hence, the patient must wait at least six months after weaning, says Dr. Smiley.
All efforts are made to avoid additional scars in mommy makeover revision, so the surgeon would simply use the previous incision sites. However, some patients may have to accept a longer scar to achieve the optimal breast shape or to preserve the natural curves and contours of their tummy.
For instance, a patient who previously had a mini tummy tuck (its scar is typically 4-6 inches in length) but later gained weight or became pregnant may need her scar extended from hip to hip, which is the standard technique, to achieve a flatter abdomen and a narrower waistline.
Also, a patient who had a modified form of breast lift (less scarring) may have to accept the scars from the standard technique (it uses an anchor-shaped incision for additional lifting effect) if she requires a more extensive revision.
In the event of botched mommy makeover surgery, Dr. Smiley says it is of critical importance to wait at least six months before a revision is attempted. The idea is to wait for the skin to relax and the implants (in the case of breast augmentation surgery) to settle.
Performing revisions too soon is like “hitting a moving target,” hence the results are harder to predict, he explains.
Mastopexy for tuberous breasts is designed to correct the herniated appearance of the nipple area. Oftentimes, it also incorporate the use of breast implants to further improve the overall projection and shape, as suggested by leading Los Angeles plastic surgeon Dr. Tarick Smiley.
Mastopexy, or breast lift in layman’s term, is typically performed to reshape the sagging breasts. However, women with tuberous breast deformity can also benefit from this procedure.
While the exact origin of tuberous breasts remains unclear, its physical manifestations have been widely studied: They are caused by constriction of the connective tissue around and behind the areola, and the weak and thin tissue support that leads to the puffiness and herniation of the nipple area.
Aside from areola puffiness, mastopexy for tuberous breasts also deals with asymmetry in variable degrees (i.e., some are very mild while others are highly obvious) due to differences in shape, nipple size, breast volume, and projection.
Other physical manifestations of tuberous breasts include little soft tissue, enlarged or wide areola complex, and drooping appearance.
Mastopexy for tuberous breasts not just corrects the drooping appearance. Oftentimes, the surgeon must also remove some tissue behind the areola complex to reduce its puffiness. This is achieved by creating incisions around the areola’s edges, which typically fade into imperceptible scars.
The round incisions along the areola’s edges can also allow the surgeon to reduce its size.
While the tuberous breasts could be improved with mastopexy alone (without breast implants), it is important to note that it has its own limits.
With a simultaneous breast implant surgery, the surgeon is able to reduce the wide spacing between the breasts and improve their overall shape and volume.
During mastopexy for tuberous breasts that includes implants, it becomes more important than ever to release the constricting bands of connective tissue. The goal is to allow the prosthetics to settle centrally behind the areola complex, leading to a natural-looking shape.
Mastopexy for tuberous breasts is technically more demanding than a breast lift involving an “average” patient (no significant deformity; only soft tissue laxity due to aging or pregnancy). For this reason, one should be extra strict when choosing a surgeon.
Aside from having appropriate board certifications, the “right” surgeon should also be performing mastopexy, breast augmentation, reduction, and reconstructive breast surgeries on a regular basis. Ideally, he must be able to present hundreds if not thousands of before-and-after photos of his actual patients, which can serve as a proof that he has extensive experience.